Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 23-24: Surprisingly Low-Scoring Affairs

Contrary to expectations and proof you can’t rely too much on early-season stats, offense was hard to come by in our short interleague series with Three Rivers Blues. Only seven combined runs were scored in the two games. 

The first game, our lone trip to Three Rivers Stadium, was hitless until the 4th inning. Carlos Delgado got us on the board with a 2-run homer, and Bert Blyleven made it hold up for a 3-2 victory. That’s our third straight one-run victory as we finally start to even that statistic after the 0-6 start. 

Blyleven pitched a complete game, giving up 2 runs and 4 hits, his best start since his first one. Through six outings, he’s 3-3 with a solid 3.77 ERA, which is just fine for a 4th starter.

Game 23

In the return home, Burt Hooton pitched well again with just 1 run allowed in 7 innings, but we couldn’t generate anything against the great Mike Scott. Scott pitched 7 shutout innings to improve to 5-1, the league’s first 5-game winner.

Game 24

We return to the road for four games in Metropolitan Stadium against $24 and Some Change, the final division opponent we’re getting to see. We are all packed together in the standings with 2 games of each other, so it’s going to be important to fare well in these showdowns. 

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

My Draft Recap

Writing up summaries of our draft or team-building process can be one of the ways many owners liven up the Sim League Baseball site forums. Before undertaking this blog, I made those one of my main writing outlets about the game.

I am pasting below what I posted about the draft for this 24×24 league, and in future posts I hope to take a deeper dive into some of these players and seasons, too. Recall that we drafted one player each from the 1969-1992 seasons, and had to use each of the 24 franchises once and only once as well. So once you used a year or team, those were off your draft board for the duration. The full draft is viewable on the commissioner’s spreadsheet here.

(Apologies in advance for jargon and references that don’t make much sense outside of the game’s regulars, but I think my self-effacing draft recap holds up regardless):

 

Let’s recap the draft from the WIS (Wow I Screwed up) 24×24 league.

First, I need to praise the structure and flow of this draft, because it got more and more intriguing as it progressed. I honestly believe this theme was worthy of a WISC Round 2. By the time you’ve drafted half your team, you’ve reduced your potential player pool to perhaps a quarter of where it started because of all the years and teams you have to ignore, plus all the other seasons of players already drafted. The number of pegs available to fit into the remaining holes dwindles rapidly until you’re forced into some very difficult decisions.

And then there are the unforced errors, the guys who look great at the time but later don’t fit as well as you’d hoped. You wanted to set up a platoon somewhere, but the other half never materialized. Or you wanted to stay as low in salary as possible, so you turned down a more expensive option only later to realize you wish you’d taken him. Or you misjudged the depth of a position, a year, or a team and realized it much too late.

I, of course, did all of those things. The end result doesn’t look too bad, but the sausage-making that went into it is not suitable for innocent eyes. The concept you have to appreciate here is the sunk cost fallacy. Once you’ve spent the money on someone, your psychology forces you to think you have to make that option work even when a better one presents itself. This leads to more errors, none of which can be undone.

Round 1, Pick 24: 1988 Teddy Higuera, SP, Brewers
The only advantage of picking last is a chance to vault to the top of Round 2 with a strategic salary pick, but my target of 1980 JR Richard went a few picks before me and I couldn’t get anyone cheap enough that I felt was worthy. I wanted to fortify the top of my rotation in the first two picks, and Higuera came in low enough to get me 3rd in R2. Still, I got the 18th pitcher of the round out of 18, and there’s no sugarcoating that disadvantage.

Round 2, Pick 3: 1969 Mike Cuellar, SP, Orioles
Best SP I could grab at this point. Now at least I have two I can be happy with, even if neither really dominates.

Round 3, Pick 9: 1984 Ryne Sandberg, 2B, Cubs
I looked at position scarcity, and after SP I felt like the biggest dropoff from the top guys was at 2B and SS. Of the best remaining at those two spots, Ryno felt like the strong move. Still happy with this pick.

Round 4, Pick 11: 1971 Bobby Murcer, OF, Yankees
I was hoping for Yaz, who was snatched up by nobagel69 two picks before me. There was so much depth at OF and 1B that I was tempted to avoid those spots longer, but Murcer brought a full package. I also might have taken 1987 Eric Davis instead, but he went about 15 picks earlier. Still content now. I have two strong hitters with speed who play good defense.

Round 5, Pick 16: 1975 Burt Hooton, SP, Dodgers
Now we come to my first regret. The group of SP I really like was dwindling fast, and I felt like I needed to get one more before long or I’d end up with La Marr Hoyt or some other disaster (apologies to whoever actually drafted Hoyt, who will probably go 4-0 against me now). But there were other decent pitchers left, and in retrospect it was much too early and the wrong guy to use up my Dodgers pick on. Seeing some of the Blue Crew who went in much later rounds added pang after pang to this one.
Ouch Factor: Willie Wilson, who would have made a perfect CF for me, went 3 picks later. And Lenny Dykstra 4 picks after that.

Round 6, Pick 17: 1987 Kal Daniels, OF, Reds
I’m very fond of this Daniels season for his awesome bat and speed, and though he’s under 500 PA I can certainly find a platoon mate from the RH side later. Now my lineup has three fast guys who are very productive. But I’ve now filled two corner OF spots early when there is tons of depth there, and scarcity at other positions means I’ll be much worse there than I had to be. Mollifying myself by thinking Murcer can play CF with his B+ range if worst comes to worst.
Ouch Factor: I really wanted 78 Dave Parker, but dlchow grabbed him 5 picks earlier.

Round 7, Pick 12: 1979 Gene Tenace, C, Padres
Hey look, La Marr Hoyt went this round! Maybe Hooton wasn’t so bad … I am seeing a lot of speed drafted around the league and at this point Tenace is one of two strong-armed catchers who does enough offensively to be at the top of my list. I looked through the Padres options and felt like that’s a team I don’t want to wait too long to take either, because they mostly stank. The other guy I weighed heavily here was Mickey Tettleton, who went two picks later.

Round 8, Pick 10: 1992 Rod Beck, RP, Giants
Great bullpen options aren’t exactly plentiful in this draft, and I wanted at least a couple solid guys. Shooter has 90+ strong innings, so I don’t mind dipping into the pen at this spot if I’m getting a lot out of him.
Ouch Factor: John Mayberry, who I’d been eyeing for 1B, went at the end of the round.

Round 9, Pick 6: 1976 Garry Maddox, OF, Phillies
The CF candidates I had targeted were starting to disappear, and I have been enamored of Maddox since I watched him glide across crappy turf outfields in concrete donut stadiums in the 70s. More speed and a .330 average don’t hurt at all. Filling up my outfield this early isn’t brilliant, though. But I can’t resist, and I’m certain he will track down everything in the air all season to justify the pick.
Ouch Factor: Several good 3B from teams I’d already used went off the board this round, and I still need one. Starting to think I should have paid some attention to teams and years, but I’ve just been filling spots to this point.

Round 10, Pick 7: 1977 Bert Blyleven, SP, Rangers
I’m funny in liking to have a SP go out there every game who I feel can keep me in the game. I was pretty sure I’d lose that feeling for the back of my rotation if I didn’t grab this season. I strongly considered 1982 Joe Niekro instead, and schwarze nabbed him a few picks later. My 3rd choice, Craig Swan, also was gone by the time I picked again. I should be happy, I guess. Sudden thought: What if I can get a great SP in the supplemental and have no use for the guy I picked 10th? That’s gonna feel silly, isn’t it? Should have gone for a hitter I definitely needed.
Ouch Factor: Al Oliver, another guy I liked for 1B, went 7 picks later.

Round 11, Pick 12: 1980 Joe Sambito, RP, Astros
Not a lot of lefty relievers worth taking, and Sambito gives me another 90+ innings. A lot of relievers went off the board in the round right after this, too. Happy with this one. But, again, my lineup has gaping holes and I’m drafting guys who have far less impact overall.

Round 12, Pick 8: 1989 Todd Burns, RP, A’s
Burns was far and away the best high-inning reliever on my board at this point. I didn’t see anyone else jumping out at me after the two painful picks before me (see Ouch Factor). The chance to lock down a deep pen to go with my completed rotation felt like a good move. If these guys put up crappy numbers in the pen, I’ll feel dumb, though. Also, have I mentioned the gaping holes in my lineup??
Ouch Factor: Cecil Fielder, another 1B target, went two picks before me, and Garry Templeton, my favorite remaining SS, went one pick before me.

Round 13, Pick 13: 1970 Bob Bailey, 3B/1B, Expos
Bailey’s bat had been staring at me for several rounds. His glove is another issue, alas. Also, my lineup is starting to get righty-heavy, and he has truly awful range at 1B so now he’s a wrong-side platoon guy at 3B. And there are some good corner IF in the supplemental draft who might leave him nowhere to play. Despite his gaudy stats, he is a DH in a no-DH league. The sunk cost fallacy plays in heavily from here as I try to build the rest of the team to justify this pick … and fail. I should have taken the half-season SS Hubie Brooks with my Expos pick instead, as I’d been staring at him for many rounds too. He went 8 picks later. The self-flagellation begins in earnest now.
Ouch Factor: NebHusker started the round with Jason Thompson, the last of the 1B I really liked. Also, Hubie. Sigh.

Round 14, Pick 8: 1981 Joel Youngblood, OF, Mets
Here’s a pick that at least makes some sense, because I need a righty corner OF to platoon with Daniels, and Youngblood hits .350 from the right side with the right amount of PA. No glove or speed, but at least he fits.
Ouch Factor: Though I didn’t necessarily need all his PA, Darryl Strawberry was on the board until dlchow took him just before me. I settled for my second Mets option. What would I have done with Strawberry, though? Seems kind of silly that I took Daniels 8 rounds earlier when I could have been happy with Darryl here, which is exactly what I knew would happen at the time but did it anyway.

Round 15, Pick 7: 1991 Bobby Bonilla, 1B/3B/OF, Pirates
Here’s where you’d be right to ask if I had any strategy in mind, because I still don’t know what I was thinking. BobbyBo is productive and versatile, sure, but he’s also awful at 1B and barely better at 3B, and I don’t have much need for more PA in the corner outfield. If I’d never taken Bailey and was just sticking Bonilla at 3B, this would have made sense. And I still might want a corner guy in the supplemental because I expect all the good SS and SP to disappear early. I’m staring at a lot of wasted PA and minus plays in the infield now and wondering how I got here.

Round 16, Picks 21-22: 1982 Rafael Ramirez, SS, Braves and 1974 Bill Freehan, C/1B, Tigers
The best way to handle an error is to compound it, right? Ramirez was as good an option left at SS and at least has great range with a decent bat and speed, so I can live with him if I can’t grab a stud in the supplemental. I’m starting to think a 1B or corner OF who hits lefty would be a great pickup in that round, and there are about 6-8 guys who would really be assets. I just can’t begin to guess where I’ll be drafting that round, and I don’t know if I should hedge my bets and at least cover every position with enough PA.

And that’s why the Freehan pick still boggles my mind. I needed a backup catcher but only 100 PA or so. I already have a budding logjam with Bonilla and Bailey, yet Freehan’s C+ range at 1B looked appealing compared to those guys. But he’s another righty.
Ouch Factor: This time it’s just me inflicting it. I had been looking at Andre Thornton as a solid 1B option (another RH, alas), but he went about 15 picks before me. This was a panic move because Freehan was my best remaining Tiger, I guess, and a very solid player who I felt wouldn’t last. … But why did I need to spend so much on him when I clearly won’t use all his PA and it will only hurt my draft position later? In retrospect, painfully poor decision making.

Round 17, Picks 27-28: 1986 Gary Lucas, RP, Angels and 1985 Bob Woodward, RP, Red Sox
I needed a few more bullpen innings still and these were the best options left for me. Lucas is a serviceable lefty who doesn’t walk many guys, and Woodward has a marvelous 27 innings.
Ouch Factor: Dodgers like Doug Rau, Tommy John, Davey Lopes and Bob Welch are just coming off the board now, and I realize I missed out on a lot of players I liked by taking Hooton so early.

Round 18, Picks 17-18: 1972 Dave Goltz, SP, Twins and 1990 Alex Cole, OF, Indians
Goltz fit a need for a serviceable spot starter and long man. I weighed taking a higher-inning and less effective Bob Tewksbury but saved a little money for draft position with Goltz, who was also my best Twins target left.

Cole was a total panic pick. I was right at my deadline, and I just couldn’t settle on anyone from my remaining teams and years who fit a real need. Cole has good enough range and hits .300 and has 97 speed, all nice assets, but I probably won’t come close to using his 256 PA and just wasted more money.
Ouch Factor: Ron Gant, another guy I’d eyed seriously much earlier, fell to this round.

Round 19, Picks 11-12: 1978 Harry Chappas, SS, White Sox and Olympic Stadium
I’m staying near the top of the order, which is good. Chappas is a cheap SS backup (it came down to him and Bucky F’in Dent). Olympic was my 2nd choice park, so I’m happy to grab it. I’m down to Royals and Cardinals, 1973 and 1983. I wanted to save two players for last so I could mix and match the best options after I see how the salaries are lining up for the supplemental.
Ouch Factor: Mitchell Page, another guy I’d eyed seriously much much earlier, fell to this round. Then Larry Walker fell off the supplemental draft list, making me worry more about what options I might have to make a big hitting improvement.

Round 20, Picks 13-14: 1973 Orlando Pena, RP, Cardinals and 1983 Butch Davis, OF, Royals
I’m sitting 7th in the draft order now with nearly a $2M cushion over the spot behind me, so it’s time to really decide what I’m likely to get in the supplemental and make my final picks work towards that goal. As it turns out there’s a decent gap above and below me in salaries. My only gamble is whether to take Willie Aikens to get a better 1B bat (and, ever so slightly, glove – D instead of D- range) and chance moving down 2-4 spots in the supplemental. The only reason to take him would be to focus on a SP in the supplemental, and falling a few spots down would probably knock me out of getting my targets.

So instead I spent just enough to fill out a usable roster and stay no worse than 7th and stay flexible. I’ve got my eyes on 1B or SP with the preference to a big lefty-hitting 1B (yes, I’m talking to you, Helton, Delgado and Olerud). But if the right SP is still on the board it will be a very tough call.
Ouch Factor: Kevin Brown disappears from the supplemental draft board, seriously lessening my chances at an impact SP.

Supplemental, Pick 7: 2000 Carlos Delgado, 1B, Jays
Though I briefly toyed with a shortstop upgrade, this choice came down to Delgado or Felix Hernandez. Felix would have moved to the top of the rotation, pushing everyone else down and Blyleven into spot duty/long relief. So the question was how much better is my team with those Felix starts instead of Blyleven. Data suggests Felix is worth about 0.50-0.60 of ERA, which is maybe 20-30 runs over the course of the season. Significant, to be sure. The sunk cost fallacy factors in again, though. I’d already committed to Blyleven so long ago, so I feel wedded. Who invented this damn psychology?!

I had to take a hard look at my lineup, where the pending disaster of a 1B-3B combination of Bonilla, Bailey and Freehan awaited me. It’s all a sunk cost. I’m stuck with them. How do I make the team much better now? That’s all that matters. Try not to think about the fact I could have had Randy Johnson or Todd Helton if I’d avoided all that wasted money.

Delgado is worth about 200 points of OPS over that field, and he’s a needed lefty, and he doubles a ton with a +2 park, and he plays at least average 1B (Bonilla and Bailey are serious D- range there). It’s a huge lineup boost for 162 games, and ultimately that made the difference for me. No looking back now!

Stat Summary:
6,651 PA with a slash line of.309/.392/.505, 217 HR, 186 SB/82 CS. $65,657,096
1488 IP with a 2.47 ERA, .210 OAV, 1.02 WHIP, 0.54 HR/9. $49,922,133

I don’t feel comfortable predicting anything, except that I’ll be regretting several things if the season doesn’t go well. Heck, I’ll regret them anyway. That’s how I roll.

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 21-22: A Glimpse of the Other League

Sim League Baseball’s standard schedule uses 24 teams divided into two leagues and six divisions, with four teams per division. You play each team in your division 14 times (42 total), and each of the other eight teams in your league 12 times (96 total). The other 24 games are brief two-game series with each team in the other league (one home, one away). You only get a taste of interleague play.

My interleague schedule began with P Niek! at the Disco (praised in an earlier post for that name), and we will get to see six of these teams over the next 19 games. And that will be it, unless we are fortunate enough to get to the World Series.

Mike Cuellar made his sixth start of the season and though it was actually one of his better ones, that’s not saying much. Cuellar gave up 4 runs in 8 innings, but his ERA actually dropped to 6.64. Only one of his starts has met the criteria for a quality start (3 runs or fewer in 6 innings or more), and only barely met those minimums that time. For a second-round pick, he sure isn’t doing what I need.

Meanwhile, our opponent’s namesake Phil Niekro had his famed knuckleball working and pitched into the 9th inning en route to a 5-2 win. 

Game 21

Our one trip to Comiskey Park followed, and Teddy Higuera put up another excellent performance with 6 shutout innings to improve to 4-2. Ryne Sandberg continued a hot stretch with 3 hits, including a pair of run-scoring triples, as we returned the favor with a 3-1 victory. 

Game 22

This put us at 10-12, one game back in the division. Still pretty early to know if this team is just going to be average or has a chance to make a good run, though. Our next short matchup in interleague play is against Three Rivers Blues, who sit at 11-11. They’ve given up the most runs in the league and also have one of the top offenses. 

Categories
Baseball Covid MLB

What Can Happen in a 60-Game Season?

Because baseball naturally lends itself to an obsession with numbers (and I cannot say for certain whether the game draws me to the stats, or vice versa), even non-fans tend to know the significance of certain milestones like hitting .400 or 60 home runs. As Major League Baseball begins its shortest scheduled season by far this week, announcers and writers have offered a variety of opinions on whether an individual achievement like hitting .400 would “count” in a 60-game season.

I think we can wait to see if anyone gets halfway through this season with a legitimate chance before devoting too much brainpower to that question, but I do think there is a number very much worth thinking about from the outset: 2.7. That’s the multiplier we get from the ratio between a full 162-game schedule and the 60-game Covid-shortened one, so essentially every game “counts” like 2.7 games normally would. Winning 3 in a row is the equivalent of winning 8 in a row in a full season, relatively.

We can use 2.7 to gauge what an outstanding individual performance might look like across 60 games. For instance, 20 home runs would equate to 54 in a full season. In 2019, when players collectively reached record-breaking totals yet again, the highest individual total was 53 by the Mets’ Pete Alonso

At the 60-game mark last season, the Dodgers’ Cody Bellinger had hit 20 and wasn’t close to leading the National League. The Brewers’ Christian Yelich already had 25! That’s a pace for 68 in a full season, but he missed 32 games and fell well short at 44.

So we shouldn’t be the least surprised to see someone get to 25 or even flirt with 30 in this short season, because it’s much less difficult to sustain that level of performance for a shorter time period. Hitting 60 homers in a season remains surprisingly rare and hasn’t been achieved since Barry Bonds hit a record 73 in 2001. 

(The 60-homer mark has only been reached eight times in MLB history, in fact. A particularly fun stat is that Sammy Sosa did it three times, more than anyone else, but he failed to lead his league any of those seasons. He finished behind Bonds in 2001 and Mark McGwire in 1998 and 1999. Should they ever re-open bars, you could probably win a good bet with that piece of trivia.)

While individual numbers will certainly catch our attention in this 60-game season, the standings could offer another place worth watching. Will any team win 40 games? Probably so. That’s a 108-win pace, and in the past two seasons three teams have won between 106 to 108 games. 

Don’t be stunned if a team wins as many as 45, though. In 2013, the Dodgers put together a 42-8 midseason stretch. The 1984 Tigers opened the season 35-5. We don’t have to look far for examples of what’s possible in a chunk of a season, which is what this really is.

A team could be equally bad, too. The 1988 Orioles started the season with a record 21-game losing streak. At the 60-game mark, they were just 15-45. The worst team in 2019, the Tigers, went 47-114, and in June and July they were a combined 10-40. They started a semi-respectable 22-33 and then went 25-81 the rest of the way, which would be a 14-win pace in a 60-game season.

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 17-20: Turning the Tide?

Rationally, sure, I know a sim doesn’t understand momentum. The game engine doesn’t care what happened in the previous game, or even the previous at-bat. So players or teams getting hot or going cold only exist as the product of a series of imagined connections. 

Eventually as the sample sizes increase and the law of averages comes into effect, any initial outcomes due to luck should start to fade away. If you did a decent job assembling your team relative to the rest of the league and manage it effectively, you will hopefully see results that mirror the appropriate expectations.

We opened our four-game series against A Rod, some Wood and a Big Unit with an extra-inning walkoff 6-5 victory, but quite a few unusual occurrences led up to that. We trailed 5-1 with one out in the bottom of the 9th but put together five straight hits (three for extra bases) to tie it and even had a chance to win with a runner on 3rd and still one out. 

By the bottom of the 12th, we had run out of position players so Burt Hooton came on to pinch hit for a reliever and delivered the unlikeliest of leadoff doubles. After two outs and two walks, Bobby Murcer singled to give us our first one-run win of the season.

Ace starter Mike Cuellar again delivered a poor performance, giving up 5 runs in 7 innings to run his ERA to 7.18. The bullpen continued to make up for our starters, however, with one hit allowed over 5 scoreless innings.

Game 17

Teddy Higuera, our 1st-round draft pick, justified his selection in Game 18, giving up 1 run in 7 innings to improve to 3-2. Third-round pick Ryne Sandberg had 3 hits and scored twice as we won 3-1.

Game 18

Hooton continued the trend and showed he wasn’t just drafted for his pinch hitting (hah!) by throwing 8 innings and giving up just 1 run in a 2-1 victory for our third straight win. Sandberg’s two-run homer was all the offense we needed, and Bob Woodward pitched the 9th for his 6th save in 6 tries. Our second one-run win moved us to 2-6 in that category, and it’s starting to feel like we’re turning the tide.

Game 19

We had a chance to sweep the series and were only trailing 2-1 through 7 innings. But Bert Blyleven gave up three more runs in the 8th to put it out of reach. The bright spot is the bullpen ran its scoreless streak to 16 innings over the past six games.

Game 20

Next up: Our first interleague matchup, a two-game series (one home, one away) against P Niek! at the Disco.

Categories
Baseball Covid Sim Baseball

My 2020 WISC Debacle

I joined the Sim League Baseball game on What If Sports (aka WIS) in August 2016 and decided to enter the 96-owner WIS Championship tournament (aka the WISC) in 2017 to test out how well I’d picked up the subtleties of the game. The tournament consists of two rounds, with 24 owners advancing to the second round. Each round consists of six unique themes played at a range of salary caps with different challenges, so in theory the better owners should have a good opportunity to rise to the top without too much random bad luck interfering.

I finished 46th in my first year and learned a lot. Another year of experience got me into Round 2 (aka The Cage) my second time and I finished 15th out of the advancing 24 in the final standings. My confidence only increased when I advanced again in 2019 and finished 7th in the final standings. I was even leading the standings one-sixth of the way through Round 2. Clearly I belonged here, right?

Cut to 2020, which has of course not been like all other years in so many ways. Should I have expected it to be any different in the game world? 

I received a ranking of 26 for the 2020 tournament, based on a formula that weighs owner strength in a variety of variables. The overall field was definitely stronger, possibly a reflection of more people having time in covid quarantine to devote to hobbies, and the site seems to have had a noticeable uptick in business. 

I was pretty busy in the weeks leading up to the tournament, even working from home, but I thought I put in the necessary effort to create competitive rosters. My expectations were certainly another spot in The Cage and my eyes on getting back to the top 10. Ideally, you get better each year, right? 

Well … success has eluded me this year in a big way. We are 137 games into the 162-game season, and I’m probably mathematically eliminated from advancing. I’m in 47th place and 30 total wins below The Cage cutoff. That means I’d have to average more than a win per cycle (that’s the six games played at each of the three times daily) more than the teams ahead of me. So if everyone above me went an average 3-3 the rest of the way, I’d have to average better than 4-2. Realistically, my teams would have to play .700 ball cumulatively to have a shot. And that’s really no shot at all.

It’s not like I’m just missing the cutoff either. I’m way back, basically middle of the pack. While that’s nothing shameful, it’s hardly my expectation. There’s a little bad luck involved, as three of my teams are underperforming expected win percentage significantly (one is actually overperforming, and two are nearly spot on). Yet even if I add on 17 wins from the underperforming teams, I’d still only be in 36th place. Better, with a prayer still, but still low.

Like most people, I’m pretty eager to put 2020 in the rear-view mirror. Fitting I suppose that my WISC experience should be no better than the rest of life this year.

A little perspective never hurts either, and a covid death toll topping 130,000 in the United States reminds me that it’s a privilege to be talking about a computer game at all right now. We should all be lucky to make it through the year, period.

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 13-16: One-Run Losses Add Up

The story of the Jack Bauer Squared season has quickly become about one-run losses. We managed to suffer two more of them in our four-game series with Steroids Make You Fast and have now lost all six games decided by one run in just the first 16 games of the season.

This makes us profoundly unlucky, as our 6-10 record should be 9-7 based on our expected winning percentage (we have outscored opponents 82-75). There’s reason to believe the law of averages will turn around the bad luck, but it’s also possible there’s a deficiency in the team that is leading to this trend.

Game 13 was a 3-2 loss that extended our slide to five games. In the bottom of the 9th we put runners on 1st and 3rd with no one out but couldn’t get a run home. For some reason (I’d say go ask him, but we don’t have postgame interview abilities here), Joel Youngblood didn’t score on a double play grounder. Runners on 3rd almost always would break for the plate as soon as the first throw didn’t go home but to 2nd instead. The next batter flew out to deep center, and the rally fizzled.

Game 13

The second game of the series found a new way to create disappointment. We led 3-0 after 6 innings and then it all fell apart. Steroids Make You Fast put together a 6-run 7th and we dropped our 6th straight game, this time 6-4.

Game 14

We finally snapped the streak in Game 15, flipping the score for a 6-4 win. Our bullpen continued to be a strong element of the team, pitching three scoreless innings to preserve the lead. No outstanding individual performances, but at this point it’s just a relief.

Game 15

Alas, it didn’t take long to return to our one-run losing ways, however. Instead of salvaging a split of the series, Bert Blyleven gave up four runs in the top of the 1st and we never led. We rallied for three in the 2nd but didn’t score again until the 8th and would up losing 5-4. 

Game 16

Despite being just 6-10, we don’t face a big deficit in the division yet. The leader sits at just 8-8, and the rest of us are all 6-10. We have another four-game series coming up with A Rod, some Wood and a Big Unit, another of the 6-10 teams in the division. Clever name, but let’s just say that we aren’t curious to see what their team mascot would be. 

Categories
Baseball Hobbies Sim Baseball Sim Dynasty

Sim Dynasty: What’s Real Anyway?

Though I initially framed this blog around the start and now flow of a season in a particular game, I am also tracing my history that brought me to today. And a significant chunk of that includes a game I also still play currently.

I first signed up for Sim Dynasty in October 2002 while holding my infant son in one arm and navigating the web with the other. That baby just graduated high school.

Sim Dynasty offers a different experience of building and managing baseball (and football) teams, because owners draft their players, develop them in the minor leagues, then play out their entire major-league careers. Of course, these are not actual MLB historical players we are using, but rather their approximations.

Though there are certainly sim owners who greatly prefer either historical players or fictional ones, I have to observe that at the level of the game engine it simply doesn’t matter. I may refer to the incomparable Sim D pitcher Andy Bomback (more on him to come) or to the performances of Greg Maddux in WIS, but to a simulation all of them are just code bits that contribute information to the decision algorithm that results in an output.

Put them all together and you get games and seasons, and we put names on the statistical achievements and call them Andy Bomback or Greg Maddux. It’s all in fitting with the storylines we create in our imagination. The method of building the teams differs significantly, but what makes these and other great sim games work is that they produce game and season outcomes that mimic reality well enough to keep us coming back.

On one level we certainly must accept that nothing about this hobby is “real,” but the realism exists on a high enough plane that it satisfies the piece of my brain that craves baseball and all its numbers, streaks, championships, and (yes) players. 

Bats or bits, it doesn’t matter. 

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 10-12: Oh No, a Losing Streak!

Our three-game series against Royal Gamers didn’t go well at all. The hosts swept us, sending us to a four-game losing streak overall and dropping our record to 5-7. We are fortunately only 1 game behind in our division still, and 12 games is still very early, but 6 losses in 7 games definitely starts to mess with your confidence.

In the series opener we were facing Sid Fernandez, a longtime Met who was famously hard to hit. In fact, he started off our 24×24 season by throwing a no-hitter! We put an end to his hopes of doing it again in the 2nd inning and held a 4-3 lead until Royal Gamers rallied for 4 runs in the 6th and went on to win, 7-4.

Game 10

In the second game, once again we held a one-run lead in the 6th inning and gave up 4 runs in the bottom of the inning. Bob Bailey hit a solo homer in the 9th inning to get us within a run but we fell short, 6-5.

Game 11

The final game of the series was another close loss, this time 3-2. We scratched out a couple of runs off Catfish Hunter, and he was just a little bit better than my Bert Blyleven. That made us 0-4 in one-run games, which is a very frustrating stat. If those break 2-2, we’d be 7-5 instead. And based on our 66 runs scored vs. 57 allowed, we should be 7-5. That’s a sign we should even things out soon.

Game 12

We start an eight-game stretch of division games at home next, with Steroids Make You Fast; Just ask Jose coming in first. They are off to a 3-9 start so maybe it’s a chance to get this team back to winning ways. 

Categories
Baseball MLB Sim Baseball

Bad Neighbor League

As I described in my previous post, I won my 23rd title in Sim League Baseball today. The theme for this league was one of my favorites and worthy of some extra footnotes.

The Bad Neighbor League included only MLB teams from 1922, 1932, 1942, 1952, 1962, 1972, and 1982. Owners have to build their 25-man rosters using players from four teams, using at least six players from each team. The catch is you only get to choose two of your teams, and two of your division mates (bad neighbors) get to stick you with bad ones.

As if that weren’t enough, your third division opponent gets to “dagger” any player on your four teams that you cannot use as well as one of the four ballparks you have available to you. Oh, and the roster restrictions and salary cap are very challenging, too. 

So when you’re building the team, you have to work around using a lot of players you don’t want to and fit them in with the ones you do want. It’s a real puzzle, and everyone ends up only partially happy with their team. 

After one of my division mates “gifted” me the 1972 Texas Rangers, who were managed to a 54-100 season by Hall of Famer Ted Williams, I commented that based on the woeful hitting of that team Williams probably spent the season in the dugout daydreaming about his famous hobby, fishing. So of course I had to name the team, Ted Williams Would Rather Be Fishing.

One of my team’s heroes turned out to be a somewhat unlikely contender, considering he cost only about $1 million out of the $80 million allotted. One of the joys of games like this is expanding my knowledge of baseball history and its players, because no matter how long I keep at this I’ll be encountering players I didn’t know.

Frank Biscan pitched for the St. Louis Browns in 1942, 1946, and 1948, totalling only 148 career innings. He was a relief pitcher in an era when that role went to failed starters, a far cry from the specialized role it plays in today’s MLB. In 1942, the season I used, Biscan appeared 11 times for 27 innings and posted a 2.33 ERA. Since the cutoff for having your season used in the sim is 25 innings, the left-hander barely made it.

I installed Biscan as my closer, and he delivered a near-perfect season. He made 36 appearances for me and earned 35 saves in his first 35 tries. Only in his final game did he blow a save, but the team rallied so he earned the victory. Then in the playoffs, Biscan went 7 for 7 in saves, including 3 games in the World Series. He might well have been my MVP.

Another interesting note about Ted Williams Would Rather Be Fishing while I’m at it. The League Championship Series went a full 7 games, and in the deciding game my leadoff batter Wally Judnich of the 1942 Browns hit a home run to start the bottom of the 1st inning. Our ace pitcher, Johnny Vander Meer (most famous for throwing back-to-back no-hitters in 1938, a feat never duplicated), pitched 8 shutout innings, and Biscan finished it off for a 1-0 series-clinching victory.

Cut to the first game of the World Series. Once again, Judnich led off the bottom of the 1st inning with a home run. And once again that was the only run of a 1-0 victory. The odds against winning back-to-back games in that nearly identical fashion, let alone critical playoff games, must be astronomical. As I posted in the league forum, Holy deja vu, Batman!

One of the discoveries you make after thousands of simulated seasons is that you are actually observing many more games than have ever actually been played in the real MLB, so when something really rare pops up it has a great deal to do with quantity. Play enough games, and some remarkable achievements and unusual performances will surely arrive at some point.