Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 49-52: A Pair of Splits

We are closing in on the one-third mark of the season, and thanks to a five-game winning streak Jack Bauer Squared is at least moving in the right direction. We split two interleague two-game series to leave our record at 22-30, 7 games out of first place. 

We have now scored exactly as many runs as we’ve allowed, 236, which usually would indicate we should have a record closer to 26-26. The continuing culprit preventing that is the one-run losses, as we are just 5-12 in those decisions.

In our previous report we had wrapped up a three-game sweep and had won four straight, looking to sustain the momentum (not that code knows such a thing, of course) against 576. (That’s 24 times 24, in case you missed it.)

We were scoreless into the 6th inning of the opener at Olympic Stadium until Carlos Delgado belted a two-run homer, his 8th. Then after giving the lead away, JBS responded in the 8th inning with a two-run homer by Kal Daniels and a grand slam by Garry Maddox.

That was plenty to secure an 8-3 victory, our fifth straight. We headed next to Boston’s historic Fenway Park for our only visit.

Game 49

JBS belted two homers in the top of the 1st, by Daniels and Bobby Murcer, to take the lead. Delgado homered in the 3rd to retake the team lead from Daniels, 9 to 8, and we later broke a 3-3 tie with Daniels doubling in a run and later scoring in the 7th. 

The bullpen couldn’t hold the lead, however. This time it was Todd Burns yielding four runs in the bottom of the 8th, and our winning streak ended at five with a 7-5 defeat.

Game 50

From there JBS packed bags for the single trip to Seattle’s Kingdome, where we’d square off with 24×24 Kingdome Krushers, run by the league’s commissioner, footballmm11. Turns out he knows baseball darn well, too!

The Kingdome didn’t disappoint for Krushing, as each team had a three-run homer in the second inning (ours from Gene Tenace), and the game remained tight into the 7th inning. The Krushers worked over our bullpen to tack on 3 more runs and pulled away to a 9-5 win.

Game 51

That sent us back to Olympic Stadium, where Bert Blyleven joined the club as we recorded our third shutout in eight games after none in the first 44. Blyleven allowed 2 hits in 7 innings to improve to 7-4, and Rafael Ramirez drove in both runs in a 2-0 win.

Game 52

Next up: a three-game home series against 24 Hours at Wrigley. This is the part of the schedule where we start facing teams for the second time this season, and we lost 2 of 3 to these guys the first time around. If we’re going to make that march toward .500 stick, we’ll need to flip that around.

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 46-48: OMG, a Winning Streak!

Dear Faithful Reader, perhaps there is finally a reward for sticking with the exploits of Jack Bauer Squared. Possibly even something good could yet come of the season. Because, yes, we actually have a winning streak going!

Fresh off our series win against Tigers of the Ontario Peninsula, we headed to Candlestick Park for three games against Todd Helton??? looking to sustain momentum. And, astonishingly, for the first time all season, we did.

We jumped out to a 4-0 lead in the top of the 1st inning, finding The Stick very much to our liking. Bobby Bonilla’s two-run triple started the scoring, and we went on to a 5-2 victory behind a strong start from Burt Hooton, who earned just his second win.

Game 46

The second game featured more unlikely feats based on how the season had gone so far. Mike Cuellar finally pitched like an ace, going 8 innings for our second shutout in three games after none all season before that. He improved to 4-5 and dropped his ERA to 5.40, still a long way from where it needs to be.

Bonilla continued to be a major lifter on offense with a two-run homer, his sixth, as we cruised to a 5-0 victory.

Game 47

In the final game, we again jumped out to an early lead with a four-run 3rd inning keyed by Garry Maddox’s two-run triple. Ryne Sandberg had a pair of triples and a double as we cruised to a 10-4 victory.

Game 48

The three-game sweep ran our winning streak to four games and gave us five wins in six games. A 20-28 record looks a lot more promising than 16-28 did, and if we can sustain this push we still have a chance to get into the race soon.

Next up: two more interleague series. Hopefully this trend continues.

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 43-45: An Actual Series Win

What’s that saying about a blind squirrel finding a nut every now and then? Maybe that’s the best explanation for Jack Bauer Squared actually winning a series. Until we make a habit of it, that’s all we deserve.

JBS hosted Tigers of the Ontario Peninsula, and the opener featured a not-awful start by Mike Cuellar, one of the few times we’ve able to say that. Cuellar allowed 3 runs in 8 innings, and we actually won one of those 1-run games, 4-3.

Game 43

It’s been a long time since we won two games in a row, and so it’s no surprise we reverted to old form in losing a 1-run game right after winning one. The tiebreaking run scored in the 6th inning when catcher Gene Tenace tried to pick a runner off third base and threw it away. We twice couldn’t get a runner home from third over the final four innings and it finished up 6-5.

Game 44

The rubber game of the series featured an accomplishment we’d yet to achieve in the first 44 games. We didn’t give up any runs. And I’m pretty sure even the most casual of fans can tell you that you can’t lose if you do that.

Teddy Higuera went 8 innings, allowing 5 hits, to even his record at 5-5 and drop his ERA to 3.72. We didn’t score much, but we didn’t need to, taking the final game 2-0.

Game 45

If a sim could possibly comprehend momentum, maybe a win like that could propel us in a good direction. At 17-28 we are only 8 games behind in the NL West and still playing way below expected win percentage (.378 to .466). Granted, .466 still isn’t good enough to win, but it would be a lot more competitive.

Next up we face Todd Helton???, which is tied with Tigers of the Ontario Peninsula at 20-25 pulling up the rear of the NL East. Another series win wouldn’t be too much to ask for, I’d think.

We’ll be playing in San Francisco’s Candlestick Park, where I once had the, uh, privilege to see a game. The ‘Stick was not a great place to play baseball, largely because of wind. And compared with the beautiful park the Giants replaced it with, there’s no reason to have much nostalgia for it. 

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 40-42: It’s Not Getting Better

Jack Bauer Squared came home to Olympic Stadium for a three-game series against Piazza Blues, and about the only good news is we didn’t lose any games by 1 run. Oh no. We lost all of them by 2 or 3 runs instead!

After Bobby Bonilla doubled in a run in the 1st inning, our offense went nowhere the rest of the series opener. We managed only four hits in a 4-1 loss.

Game 40

As the second quarter of the season began, we again failed to muster much offense in a 5-2 loss. Mike Cuellar was charged with only 2 earned runs due to a pair of errors. In his 11th start, this marked the first time he didn’t allow at least 3 earned runs. None of that is impressive in the least.

Game 41

Trying to emerge from the final game of the series with some respectability, we at least kept it entertaining. Bonilla doubled in the 6th inning to tie the game 1-1, and then no one scored again until the 15th inning. 

Burt Hooton and the first five relievers to follow him yielded just the lone run and seven hits through 14 innings, but in came long man Orlando Pena for the 15th and things got out of control quickly. After allowing only one run in his first seven appearances, Pena allowed six straight runners to reach base in the 15th and was charged with 5 runs.

We didn’t give up, though. Out of position players, JBS had to send up Bert Blyleven to pinch hit to start the inning, and he predictably struck out. But then two singles and two doubles put 3 runs on the board and we had a little hope. Alas, that was as close as we could get and lost 6-4.

Game 42

The three-game sweep put us at 15-27, 9-14 at home and 6-13 on the road. Worst record in the National League. There are still 120 games to play, though, so we can try to find glimmers of hope that a turnaround remains possible.

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared MLB Sim Baseball

Games 36-39: Here We Go Again

Dear Reader, I beg your forgiveness. The results in this 24×24 league have been so disheartening, I practically wanted to scrap this project. Or at least stop narrating this seemingly doomed season and focus on any other one. Literally any of my other ones would be better, as this is the worst team I have going out of 18. Aren’t you lucky, Dear Reader?

But let’s soldier on, as we aren’t even a quarter of the way there and a run of luck could still even the tables for us.

We have two home-and-home interleague sets to catch up on, and the highlights have been few. We started off with the animals of The Hawk, the Bird, Simba and a Moose, and they mauled poor Teddy Higuera with a pair of three-run homers in the early going to take a huge lead.

We did flex some of our own power with a three-run homer by Carlos Delgado and a two-run shot by Bobby Bonilla, but there wasn’t enough to come back as we lost 8-5.

Game 36

The second game marked our lone trip to Oriole Park at Camden Yards (fitting home for a team of that name, too). This time it was our turn to take a big early lead, as we chased Mark “The Bird” Fidrych after 4 innings. 

Mike Cuellar pitched well enough to earn his 2nd win, giving up “only” 4 runs in 7 innings, and Bob Woodward kept his ERA at 0.00 by earning his 10th save in the 6-4 victory. This marked the 4th straight time we followed a loss with a win, so our recent history looked like this: L-W-L-W-L-W-L-W. 

Game 37

Our second interleague series of this set against 24 Lines About 24 Players (still in awe of the genius of the team name, I must confess) went a lot like much of the early season. Stop me if you’ve heard this before, but we lost twice by one run. We fell to 4-11 in such games, and it’s taking a lot of wind out my sails and variety out of my prose. There are only so many ways to say that your team fell just short, again.

Rickey Henderson led off the opener with a home run, something he did far more than anyone else in MLB history, 81 times. This is seemingly true of Rickey’s records, where he put huge gaps ahead of second place in the books. He hit 50% more leadoff homers than the next closest (Alfonso Soriano with 54). Rickey stole 1406 bases, and second place still belongs to Lou Brock with 938.

I digress, but since this is our only series facing Rickey I might as well indulge in some appreciation. After all, he helped beat us the way he famously did. He stole two bases, scored three runs, and 24 Lines beat us 3-2. 

Game 38

Our L-W streak ended in the second game, as our trip to Sicks’ Stadium ended in a 10-9 defeat. Bobby Bonilla hit a grand slam, but the Jack Bauer Squared pitching gave up runs in six different innings. We had the tying and go-ahead runs on in the 9th with one out, but a pair of strikeouts ended the threat. 

Game 39

So it’s a 15-24 mark we carry limping back home in hopes of turning the tide soon. But hope is not a word well associated with this team much any more.

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 31-32: Ending Slide, Trading Wins

When you can’t buy a win, you don’t care how you get one. Or who you beat. And after splitting two games with 24 Pack of 24 Distinct Ales, I’m fairly sure both sides feel the same way. 

Jack Bauer Squared came into the interleague series on a 7-game losing streak, and 24 Pack had dropped 9 of 10. So trading wins is a good enough outcome for both of us at this point.

In our game at Olympic Stadium, we rode a 3-run homer by Kal Daniels and 8 innings of 1-run pitching by Bert Blyleven to a 4-1 victory that ended our ugly slide. Bob Woodward made up for his awful extra-inning performance the previous time out with a scoreless 9th for his 8th save.

Game 31

Our visit to Cleveland’s Municipal Stadium to try for a sweep didn’t go quite as well. After taking a 2-0 lead, Teddy Higuera got roughed up for 4 runs in the 2nd inning and we could never regain the lead. 

The 5-4 loss ran our record in 1-run games to 3-9, so our 13-19 record should really be closer to 16-17 at this point. That’s hardly championship material, but it would be less to overcome to get into competition.

Game 32

Next up is a mighty challenge, too. We have to face the league’s best team, Hitmen 24×24, which at 24-8 is ahead of everyone else by 5 wins. Just have to hope we can put together a good series and maybe take two of three and gain some confidence.

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 25-28: Where Is This Train Headed?

The time has arrived, Dear Reader, to ask which of us likes suffering more. Is it me, for continuing to write my way through a season that is developing into a train wreck? Or is it you, for actually coming back to read about it?

It is quickly becoming time to recognize that this might be a disaster. We might be off the rails and careening through a long, painful process of trying to figure out what went wrong. I’ve committed to the telling of the tale, so hold onto your handrails.

We began a four-game series at $24 and Some Change in Metropolitan Stadium with an 11-13 record and a chance to establish ourselves in the division. Four games later, we left Minneapolis with our tails between our legs, whimpering.

The series opener was decidedly inauspicious. Mike Cuellar once again pitched poorly, and we trailed 9-3 going into the 9th inning. This time he gave up 6 runs and 9 hits in 7 innings, so basically that’s no really good starts and six bad ones in seven tries.

If you play enough sim games, enough unlikely events will occur, however, and somehow we scored 6 runs in the top of the 9th to tie the game. Carlos Delgado struck the big blow, the tying three-run homer. 

And then the game turned into a lengthy slog, staying 9-9 until the 14th inning. After a leadoff walk, closer Bob Woodward (who had been perfect on the season) came in and proceeded to walk the next three batters, forcing in the winning run. Just like that, the comeback was for naught, and we lost 10-9.

Game 25

Seven strong innings from the man leading our pitching staff, Teddy Higuera, put us in good position in the second game of the series. But the bullpen, so recently a strength, couldn’t hold the lead. Joe Sambito gave up two runs in the bottom of the 9th, and we lost our second straight on a walkoff and again a one-run loss, this time 3-2.

Why did I pick this team to chronicle again? Sigh.

Game 26

Forget about the bullpen being a strength anymore. Even when the offense picks up, the pen is finding ways to let us down. Desperate for a win and clinging to a 3-2 edge, Rod Beck took the hill for the third straight game but finally faltered. 

Beck allowed 4 runs in the 7th to put us behind 6-3, yet we had another comeback in us with a 4-run rally in the 8th to go back in front. But with our best relievers tired, we turned to a couple of long men to hold the lead and they couldn’t do it. $24 put up 3 more in the 8th and held on to win 9-7. 

Game 27

Desperate to avoid the sweep, we instead fell flat. Burt Hooton got roughed up for 8 runs and yielded three homers, and our losing streak stretched to five with a 9-3 loss. 

Game 28

Nothing’s going right, and we’ve fallen into last place. Is it time to delete this blog and start over with a better team?

Back to interleague play for the next four games, matchups with a pair of fellow last-place teams: 69-92 25 different teams and 24 Pack of 24 Distinct Ales. At this point, we need anything to get back on track before this train wreck of a season goes down the drain. Even the metaphors aren’t working well, alas.

Categories
Baseball Covid MLB

MLB in Trouble Already

Well, that didn’t take long. After a weekend spent joyfully celebrating the return of baseball, Monday hit with a ton of reality bricks. 

The Miami Marlins have reportedly at least 12 players testing positive for Covid-19, plus some coaches. MLB stepped in and postponed the Marlins’ scheduled game in Miami against the Baltimore Orioles. And, since the Marlins’ positive tests occurred in Philadelphia (where they’d been playing the Phillies), MLB also postponed the New York Yankees’ game in Philadelphia.

The next 24-48 hours will give an indication of whether this is a hiccup or a collapsing season. If testing shows the impact has been contained, the Marlins can dip into their pool of 60 available players and resume playing once permitted. That’s why each team has a larger-than-usual 30-man active roster and 30 more available on short notice.

But it’s easy to see the whole house of cards falling down. Postponing more than a couple of games can create scheduling nightmares in a season with few off days already. Much worse, we could see an expanding outbreak that renders teams unable to play or facilities deemed unsafe. And that’s to say nothing of what might happen if someone were to become seriously ill.

This quote in The Athletic today speaks volumes about the situation:

“Major League Baseball needs to be thinking about the Phillies,” Dr. Zachary Binney, an epidemiologist at Emory University’s Oxford College, said Monday on The Athletic’s Starkville podcast. “They have conducted perhaps an inadvertent experiment, but an experiment nonetheless, on whether the virus can be transferred in a game from one team to their opponent. And we are awaiting the results of that experiment. We’ll see that in Philly, I think, over the next three to five days or so. But I think if you want to be cautious, you should probably be quarantining the Phillies as well for the next five days. And that’s extra rough for them because really, they didn’t do anything wrong. But again, it’s the virus that sets the agenda here, and you have to build your agenda around what it’s doing.”

Any sense that continuing to play cannot be achieved safely could start a ripple effect of players and other personnel opting out, and in a very short time the experiment could be over. How many players scheduled to take the field today might already be having second thoughts? “An inadvertent experiment” can’t be the words players want to read today.

Like many others, I got caught up in enjoying the games again the past few days. I started to believe this might just work, being an outdoor game with lots of space between players and precautions being taken. 

If this can’t work in today’s America, though, I can’t imagine how the NFL can pull it off this fall. And colleges? I doubt they ever take the field. Too many people in much too close quarters, way more so than baseball requires.

The NBA’s Orlando bubble experiment gets under way within the week, and though they seem to be taking strong measures to protect the players’ health, that could unravel just as quickly if anything goes wrong. 

Maybe sports is a luxury the U.S. just couldn’t manage because of how poorly we’ve handled containing the virus in comparison to the rest of the world. These restarts didn’t take place during a time when the cases were under control, but rather the opposite, during a spike. Maybe things can still work out, but we won’t have to look far for reasons why if they don’t.

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

Games 23-24: Surprisingly Low-Scoring Affairs

Contrary to expectations and proof you can’t rely too much on early-season stats, offense was hard to come by in our short interleague series with Three Rivers Blues. Only seven combined runs were scored in the two games. 

The first game, our lone trip to Three Rivers Stadium, was hitless until the 4th inning. Carlos Delgado got us on the board with a 2-run homer, and Bert Blyleven made it hold up for a 3-2 victory. That’s our third straight one-run victory as we finally start to even that statistic after the 0-6 start. 

Blyleven pitched a complete game, giving up 2 runs and 4 hits, his best start since his first one. Through six outings, he’s 3-3 with a solid 3.77 ERA, which is just fine for a 4th starter.

Game 23

In the return home, Burt Hooton pitched well again with just 1 run allowed in 7 innings, but we couldn’t generate anything against the great Mike Scott. Scott pitched 7 shutout innings to improve to 5-1, the league’s first 5-game winner.

Game 24

We return to the road for four games in Metropolitan Stadium against $24 and Some Change, the final division opponent we’re getting to see. We are all packed together in the standings with 2 games of each other, so it’s going to be important to fare well in these showdowns. 

Categories
Baseball Jack Bauer Squared Sim Baseball

My Draft Recap

Writing up summaries of our draft or team-building process can be one of the ways many owners liven up the Sim League Baseball site forums. Before undertaking this blog, I made those one of my main writing outlets about the game.

I am pasting below what I posted about the draft for this 24×24 league, and in future posts I hope to take a deeper dive into some of these players and seasons, too. Recall that we drafted one player each from the 1969-1992 seasons, and had to use each of the 24 franchises once and only once as well. So once you used a year or team, those were off your draft board for the duration. The full draft is viewable on the commissioner’s spreadsheet here.

(Apologies in advance for jargon and references that don’t make much sense outside of the game’s regulars, but I think my self-effacing draft recap holds up regardless):

 

Let’s recap the draft from the WIS (Wow I Screwed up) 24×24 league.

First, I need to praise the structure and flow of this draft, because it got more and more intriguing as it progressed. I honestly believe this theme was worthy of a WISC Round 2. By the time you’ve drafted half your team, you’ve reduced your potential player pool to perhaps a quarter of where it started because of all the years and teams you have to ignore, plus all the other seasons of players already drafted. The number of pegs available to fit into the remaining holes dwindles rapidly until you’re forced into some very difficult decisions.

And then there are the unforced errors, the guys who look great at the time but later don’t fit as well as you’d hoped. You wanted to set up a platoon somewhere, but the other half never materialized. Or you wanted to stay as low in salary as possible, so you turned down a more expensive option only later to realize you wish you’d taken him. Or you misjudged the depth of a position, a year, or a team and realized it much too late.

I, of course, did all of those things. The end result doesn’t look too bad, but the sausage-making that went into it is not suitable for innocent eyes. The concept you have to appreciate here is the sunk cost fallacy. Once you’ve spent the money on someone, your psychology forces you to think you have to make that option work even when a better one presents itself. This leads to more errors, none of which can be undone.

Round 1, Pick 24: 1988 Teddy Higuera, SP, Brewers
The only advantage of picking last is a chance to vault to the top of Round 2 with a strategic salary pick, but my target of 1980 JR Richard went a few picks before me and I couldn’t get anyone cheap enough that I felt was worthy. I wanted to fortify the top of my rotation in the first two picks, and Higuera came in low enough to get me 3rd in R2. Still, I got the 18th pitcher of the round out of 18, and there’s no sugarcoating that disadvantage.

Round 2, Pick 3: 1969 Mike Cuellar, SP, Orioles
Best SP I could grab at this point. Now at least I have two I can be happy with, even if neither really dominates.

Round 3, Pick 9: 1984 Ryne Sandberg, 2B, Cubs
I looked at position scarcity, and after SP I felt like the biggest dropoff from the top guys was at 2B and SS. Of the best remaining at those two spots, Ryno felt like the strong move. Still happy with this pick.

Round 4, Pick 11: 1971 Bobby Murcer, OF, Yankees
I was hoping for Yaz, who was snatched up by nobagel69 two picks before me. There was so much depth at OF and 1B that I was tempted to avoid those spots longer, but Murcer brought a full package. I also might have taken 1987 Eric Davis instead, but he went about 15 picks earlier. Still content now. I have two strong hitters with speed who play good defense.

Round 5, Pick 16: 1975 Burt Hooton, SP, Dodgers
Now we come to my first regret. The group of SP I really like was dwindling fast, and I felt like I needed to get one more before long or I’d end up with La Marr Hoyt or some other disaster (apologies to whoever actually drafted Hoyt, who will probably go 4-0 against me now). But there were other decent pitchers left, and in retrospect it was much too early and the wrong guy to use up my Dodgers pick on. Seeing some of the Blue Crew who went in much later rounds added pang after pang to this one.
Ouch Factor: Willie Wilson, who would have made a perfect CF for me, went 3 picks later. And Lenny Dykstra 4 picks after that.

Round 6, Pick 17: 1987 Kal Daniels, OF, Reds
I’m very fond of this Daniels season for his awesome bat and speed, and though he’s under 500 PA I can certainly find a platoon mate from the RH side later. Now my lineup has three fast guys who are very productive. But I’ve now filled two corner OF spots early when there is tons of depth there, and scarcity at other positions means I’ll be much worse there than I had to be. Mollifying myself by thinking Murcer can play CF with his B+ range if worst comes to worst.
Ouch Factor: I really wanted 78 Dave Parker, but dlchow grabbed him 5 picks earlier.

Round 7, Pick 12: 1979 Gene Tenace, C, Padres
Hey look, La Marr Hoyt went this round! Maybe Hooton wasn’t so bad … I am seeing a lot of speed drafted around the league and at this point Tenace is one of two strong-armed catchers who does enough offensively to be at the top of my list. I looked through the Padres options and felt like that’s a team I don’t want to wait too long to take either, because they mostly stank. The other guy I weighed heavily here was Mickey Tettleton, who went two picks later.

Round 8, Pick 10: 1992 Rod Beck, RP, Giants
Great bullpen options aren’t exactly plentiful in this draft, and I wanted at least a couple solid guys. Shooter has 90+ strong innings, so I don’t mind dipping into the pen at this spot if I’m getting a lot out of him.
Ouch Factor: John Mayberry, who I’d been eyeing for 1B, went at the end of the round.

Round 9, Pick 6: 1976 Garry Maddox, OF, Phillies
The CF candidates I had targeted were starting to disappear, and I have been enamored of Maddox since I watched him glide across crappy turf outfields in concrete donut stadiums in the 70s. More speed and a .330 average don’t hurt at all. Filling up my outfield this early isn’t brilliant, though. But I can’t resist, and I’m certain he will track down everything in the air all season to justify the pick.
Ouch Factor: Several good 3B from teams I’d already used went off the board this round, and I still need one. Starting to think I should have paid some attention to teams and years, but I’ve just been filling spots to this point.

Round 10, Pick 7: 1977 Bert Blyleven, SP, Rangers
I’m funny in liking to have a SP go out there every game who I feel can keep me in the game. I was pretty sure I’d lose that feeling for the back of my rotation if I didn’t grab this season. I strongly considered 1982 Joe Niekro instead, and schwarze nabbed him a few picks later. My 3rd choice, Craig Swan, also was gone by the time I picked again. I should be happy, I guess. Sudden thought: What if I can get a great SP in the supplemental and have no use for the guy I picked 10th? That’s gonna feel silly, isn’t it? Should have gone for a hitter I definitely needed.
Ouch Factor: Al Oliver, another guy I liked for 1B, went 7 picks later.

Round 11, Pick 12: 1980 Joe Sambito, RP, Astros
Not a lot of lefty relievers worth taking, and Sambito gives me another 90+ innings. A lot of relievers went off the board in the round right after this, too. Happy with this one. But, again, my lineup has gaping holes and I’m drafting guys who have far less impact overall.

Round 12, Pick 8: 1989 Todd Burns, RP, A’s
Burns was far and away the best high-inning reliever on my board at this point. I didn’t see anyone else jumping out at me after the two painful picks before me (see Ouch Factor). The chance to lock down a deep pen to go with my completed rotation felt like a good move. If these guys put up crappy numbers in the pen, I’ll feel dumb, though. Also, have I mentioned the gaping holes in my lineup??
Ouch Factor: Cecil Fielder, another 1B target, went two picks before me, and Garry Templeton, my favorite remaining SS, went one pick before me.

Round 13, Pick 13: 1970 Bob Bailey, 3B/1B, Expos
Bailey’s bat had been staring at me for several rounds. His glove is another issue, alas. Also, my lineup is starting to get righty-heavy, and he has truly awful range at 1B so now he’s a wrong-side platoon guy at 3B. And there are some good corner IF in the supplemental draft who might leave him nowhere to play. Despite his gaudy stats, he is a DH in a no-DH league. The sunk cost fallacy plays in heavily from here as I try to build the rest of the team to justify this pick … and fail. I should have taken the half-season SS Hubie Brooks with my Expos pick instead, as I’d been staring at him for many rounds too. He went 8 picks later. The self-flagellation begins in earnest now.
Ouch Factor: NebHusker started the round with Jason Thompson, the last of the 1B I really liked. Also, Hubie. Sigh.

Round 14, Pick 8: 1981 Joel Youngblood, OF, Mets
Here’s a pick that at least makes some sense, because I need a righty corner OF to platoon with Daniels, and Youngblood hits .350 from the right side with the right amount of PA. No glove or speed, but at least he fits.
Ouch Factor: Though I didn’t necessarily need all his PA, Darryl Strawberry was on the board until dlchow took him just before me. I settled for my second Mets option. What would I have done with Strawberry, though? Seems kind of silly that I took Daniels 8 rounds earlier when I could have been happy with Darryl here, which is exactly what I knew would happen at the time but did it anyway.

Round 15, Pick 7: 1991 Bobby Bonilla, 1B/3B/OF, Pirates
Here’s where you’d be right to ask if I had any strategy in mind, because I still don’t know what I was thinking. BobbyBo is productive and versatile, sure, but he’s also awful at 1B and barely better at 3B, and I don’t have much need for more PA in the corner outfield. If I’d never taken Bailey and was just sticking Bonilla at 3B, this would have made sense. And I still might want a corner guy in the supplemental because I expect all the good SS and SP to disappear early. I’m staring at a lot of wasted PA and minus plays in the infield now and wondering how I got here.

Round 16, Picks 21-22: 1982 Rafael Ramirez, SS, Braves and 1974 Bill Freehan, C/1B, Tigers
The best way to handle an error is to compound it, right? Ramirez was as good an option left at SS and at least has great range with a decent bat and speed, so I can live with him if I can’t grab a stud in the supplemental. I’m starting to think a 1B or corner OF who hits lefty would be a great pickup in that round, and there are about 6-8 guys who would really be assets. I just can’t begin to guess where I’ll be drafting that round, and I don’t know if I should hedge my bets and at least cover every position with enough PA.

And that’s why the Freehan pick still boggles my mind. I needed a backup catcher but only 100 PA or so. I already have a budding logjam with Bonilla and Bailey, yet Freehan’s C+ range at 1B looked appealing compared to those guys. But he’s another righty.
Ouch Factor: This time it’s just me inflicting it. I had been looking at Andre Thornton as a solid 1B option (another RH, alas), but he went about 15 picks before me. This was a panic move because Freehan was my best remaining Tiger, I guess, and a very solid player who I felt wouldn’t last. … But why did I need to spend so much on him when I clearly won’t use all his PA and it will only hurt my draft position later? In retrospect, painfully poor decision making.

Round 17, Picks 27-28: 1986 Gary Lucas, RP, Angels and 1985 Bob Woodward, RP, Red Sox
I needed a few more bullpen innings still and these were the best options left for me. Lucas is a serviceable lefty who doesn’t walk many guys, and Woodward has a marvelous 27 innings.
Ouch Factor: Dodgers like Doug Rau, Tommy John, Davey Lopes and Bob Welch are just coming off the board now, and I realize I missed out on a lot of players I liked by taking Hooton so early.

Round 18, Picks 17-18: 1972 Dave Goltz, SP, Twins and 1990 Alex Cole, OF, Indians
Goltz fit a need for a serviceable spot starter and long man. I weighed taking a higher-inning and less effective Bob Tewksbury but saved a little money for draft position with Goltz, who was also my best Twins target left.

Cole was a total panic pick. I was right at my deadline, and I just couldn’t settle on anyone from my remaining teams and years who fit a real need. Cole has good enough range and hits .300 and has 97 speed, all nice assets, but I probably won’t come close to using his 256 PA and just wasted more money.
Ouch Factor: Ron Gant, another guy I’d eyed seriously much earlier, fell to this round.

Round 19, Picks 11-12: 1978 Harry Chappas, SS, White Sox and Olympic Stadium
I’m staying near the top of the order, which is good. Chappas is a cheap SS backup (it came down to him and Bucky F’in Dent). Olympic was my 2nd choice park, so I’m happy to grab it. I’m down to Royals and Cardinals, 1973 and 1983. I wanted to save two players for last so I could mix and match the best options after I see how the salaries are lining up for the supplemental.
Ouch Factor: Mitchell Page, another guy I’d eyed seriously much much earlier, fell to this round. Then Larry Walker fell off the supplemental draft list, making me worry more about what options I might have to make a big hitting improvement.

Round 20, Picks 13-14: 1973 Orlando Pena, RP, Cardinals and 1983 Butch Davis, OF, Royals
I’m sitting 7th in the draft order now with nearly a $2M cushion over the spot behind me, so it’s time to really decide what I’m likely to get in the supplemental and make my final picks work towards that goal. As it turns out there’s a decent gap above and below me in salaries. My only gamble is whether to take Willie Aikens to get a better 1B bat (and, ever so slightly, glove – D instead of D- range) and chance moving down 2-4 spots in the supplemental. The only reason to take him would be to focus on a SP in the supplemental, and falling a few spots down would probably knock me out of getting my targets.

So instead I spent just enough to fill out a usable roster and stay no worse than 7th and stay flexible. I’ve got my eyes on 1B or SP with the preference to a big lefty-hitting 1B (yes, I’m talking to you, Helton, Delgado and Olerud). But if the right SP is still on the board it will be a very tough call.
Ouch Factor: Kevin Brown disappears from the supplemental draft board, seriously lessening my chances at an impact SP.

Supplemental, Pick 7: 2000 Carlos Delgado, 1B, Jays
Though I briefly toyed with a shortstop upgrade, this choice came down to Delgado or Felix Hernandez. Felix would have moved to the top of the rotation, pushing everyone else down and Blyleven into spot duty/long relief. So the question was how much better is my team with those Felix starts instead of Blyleven. Data suggests Felix is worth about 0.50-0.60 of ERA, which is maybe 20-30 runs over the course of the season. Significant, to be sure. The sunk cost fallacy factors in again, though. I’d already committed to Blyleven so long ago, so I feel wedded. Who invented this damn psychology?!

I had to take a hard look at my lineup, where the pending disaster of a 1B-3B combination of Bonilla, Bailey and Freehan awaited me. It’s all a sunk cost. I’m stuck with them. How do I make the team much better now? That’s all that matters. Try not to think about the fact I could have had Randy Johnson or Todd Helton if I’d avoided all that wasted money.

Delgado is worth about 200 points of OPS over that field, and he’s a needed lefty, and he doubles a ton with a +2 park, and he plays at least average 1B (Bonilla and Bailey are serious D- range there). It’s a huge lineup boost for 162 games, and ultimately that made the difference for me. No looking back now!

Stat Summary:
6,651 PA with a slash line of.309/.392/.505, 217 HR, 186 SB/82 CS. $65,657,096
1488 IP with a 2.47 ERA, .210 OAV, 1.02 WHIP, 0.54 HR/9. $49,922,133

I don’t feel comfortable predicting anything, except that I’ll be regretting several things if the season doesn’t go well. Heck, I’ll regret them anyway. That’s how I roll.